As the House of Representatives debated net neutrality, I weighed in with Rep. Rick Larsen. He went on to vote against regulating to protect internet freedom–he feels that since consumers are not being harmed today, Congress should not step in to regulate.
Email thread:
—–Original Message—–
From: Evan Callahan [mailto:evanc@npowerseattle.org]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 10:52 PM
To: Larsen, Rick
Subject: RE: please protect net neutrality
Rick,
I don’t have an example of content being blocked or tiered — as I understand it, the FCC doesn’t allow it now, but will allow it once the telecom law is passed.
It would be nice if “open competition” were the goal of the telecom companies, but I think that is really naïve. They are highly monopolistic and always fighting for the right to consolidate and grow their markets. I am glad you support a free internet, because I expect that we will see the need for “net neutrality” legislation soon. Otherwise, the internet will be
like TV — individuals and non-profit groups won’t be able to afford to get their message out.
Regulation has gotten a bad name in recent years, and public officials have in my view sold our public resources to the highest bidder. The Internet is not just a “delivery platform” for the free market, it is a public good.
Warm Regards,
Evan Callahan
—–Original Message—–
From: Larsen, Rick [mailto:Rick.Larsen@mail.house.gov]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 7:26 PM
To: Evan Callahan
Subject: RE: please protect net neutrality
Thanks very much for the e-mail concerning my vote on the Markey Amendment. We don’t disagree that the internet should maintain is open best efforts delivery platform. A question for you: Do you have an existing example of an Internet Service Provider “blocking” or “tiering” a content provider from you? The internet has been amazingly democratic and empowering to non traditional businesses and individuals. It has also been left mostly free from government regulation and as a result the free market has driven internet development and use. I want an open internet just like you but I am concerned that there is not a consunmer protection problem that would require a new government regulated set of rules at this time. What are your thoughts?
Best,
Rick
—–Original Message—–
From: Evan Callahan [mailto:evanc@npowerseattle.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 8:12 AM
To: Larsen, Rick
Subject: please protect net neutrality
Dear Congressman,
I’m a constituent in Clinton. I depend on the public Internet to support my family. I strongly urge you to support net neutrality in the current legislation being considered.
Specifically, please support Rep. Ed Markey’s Net Neutrality amendment to the COPE telecom law. If that bill doesn’t protect net neutrality, please vote No.
Warm Regards,
Evan Callahan
3540 Quade Rd
Clinton, WA 98236